Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India

Received: 2 September 2025     Accepted: 24 September 2025     Published: 18 October 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In 2016, the Indian government took a very firm stance on the black money market, which was followed by demonetization. Afterward, the government realized that the economy would benefit more from digital transactions and plastic money, considering Singapore as a reference. People were struggling to meet their basic needs; consequently, the government understood the importance of stabilizing the money supply, leading to the emergence of digital transactions and UPI. Objective: to investigate the dynamics of UPI transactions post-2020 and how UPI has been very critical in making financial inclusion a possibility in the Indian scenario. The paper also evaluates the role of UPI in MSMEs growth and development. Methods: Information about UPI transactions, including their volume and value, the number of active users, and their geographic distribution, was gathered using the NPCI dataset, on which we ran a linear regression model. For MSMEs, we saw a span of the last 4 years through the government’s annual report. Findings: Linear regression showed time predicts UPI transaction volume (R² = 0.97, p < 0.001) and value (R² = 0.837, p < 0.001), indicating that UPI adoption growth explains much of the rise in digital activity. The compound annual growth rate of UPI transaction value was about 19.75% from 2020 to 2024. The MSME transaction data from 2020-21 to 2023-24 shows a trend of an increase in the number and value of transactions, with the vast majority of them being carried out online during this time.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 13, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19
Page(s) 336-344
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Unified Payment Interface, MSME, Digital Transaction, Economic Growth, Financial Inclusion

1. Introduction
The global drive towards digital transformation has profoundly reshaped economic landscapes, placing paramount importance on the development of efficient, secure, and universally accessible payment systems. Within this dynamic environment, the Unified Payment Interface, a groundbreaking innovation by the National Payments Corporation of India, stands as a premier example of a real-time digital payment solution. Widely acknowledged for its role in revolutionizing inter-bank peer-to-peer (P2P) and person-to-merchant (P2M) transactions, UPI has rapidly solidified its position as a critical catalyst for digital financial inclusion and a modernizing force within payment infrastructures, particularly evident in emerging economies.
India's digital payments system has undergone remarkable advancements, primarily driven by technological improvements and the visionary efforts of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). A pivotal moment in this evolution occurred during the demonetization initiative in November 2016, when the Indian government implemented various measures to promote digital transactions. This shift notably transformed the number and value of payment systems, marking a significant turning point in the country's economic landscape . Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been a strong advocate for enhancing cashless transactions as a critical component of the government's reform agenda post-demonetization, leading to substantial growth in digital payment methods .
The launch of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) in 2016 represents a paradigm shift in payment technology, offering an interoperable platform that enables seamless transactions among various banking and financial institutions . UPI's rapid adoption has transformed the way individuals and businesses conduct financial transactions, extending its impact beyond mere convenience to influencing macroeconomic factors such as financial inclusion and the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission .
Furthermore, Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a crucial role in India's economic and social development. Accounting for approximately 30% of the nation's GDP and providing employment to over 110 million people, the sector comprises around 6.33 crore MSMEs (Ministry of MSME, Annual Report 21-22). The ongoing wave of digitization has significantly benefited MSMEs, contributing positively to the broader Indian economy and highlighting the transformative power of digital advancements .
2. Literature Review
The convenience and affordability of digital financial services provide substantial benefits for those facing financial exclusion. In India, a large portion of the population, particularly individuals working in the informal sector, encounters such exclusion as noted by Jishajoseph & Varghese (2014) . Additionally, research by Nandru et al. (2021) indicates that the digitization of financial services facilitates easier access for individuals to the formal financial sector, thereby enhancing their entry into this space.
According to Karmakar (2024), the emergence of UPI is inextricably linked to the larger conversation about financial inclusion, which aims to give underprivileged groups access to financial services and acts as a stimulant for economic growth by bringing more people into the official financial system . With low transaction costs and a smartphone-centric interface, UPI extends financial inclusion and economic growth beyond urban centres to rural areas .
The introduction of UPI has significantly contributed to financial inclusion by integrating a larger segment of the population into the formal financial system. UPI has become an important driver of financial inclusion, a multifaceted concept that includes the availability and use of accessible and reasonably priced financial services, especially for marginalized and vulnerable groups, to enable their participation in the formal economy and promote equitable growth . Mehta (2025) also observed the drastically changed scene of financial inclusion in India after the spread of digital payments, especially via UPI .
Fahad and Shahid (2022) used the DOI theory components to explore participants' usage and recommendation intentions towards UPI via data collection using convenience sampling. One of the results of the study suggested that users saw comparative advantages of UPI over other payment systems, particularly cash payment systems, based on efficiency, convenience, and timely payment . Dr Chatterjee and Roshna (2017) conducted an explorative study using government data and found that within few months after the launch of Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, on 28th August 2016, 19.72 crore bank accounts were opened with deposits worth Rs. 28699.65 crores, which created a fertile platform for the growth and proliferation of UPI among the masses . The research by Duvendack et al. (2023) highlights how the Jan Dhan Yojana has significantly advanced digital financial inclusion in India by simplifying the process of opening bank accounts through biometric identification linked to mobile phone numbers . Vidani (2024) notes that the user-friendly interface of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) has played a crucial role in democratizing access to financial services, reaching even the most remote regions . Furthermore, Santiso (2022) observes that this approach promotes transparency and reduces corruption, ensuring more effective distribution of social transfers . Additionally, Buteau et al. (2021) emphasize the Indian government's commitment to Direct Benefit Transfers, which leverage digital platforms to directly deposit subsidies and benefits into beneficiaries' accounts, thus minimizing leakages and enhancing efficiency .
According to Kini and Basri (2022), the coronavirus pandemic has ushered in a new era of contactless mobile banking, significantly impacting the adoption of digital payment systems . The increased reliance on digital platforms during the pandemic has further accelerated the use of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI). Windasari et al. (2022) highlight that both businesses and consumers are increasingly seeking contactless payment solutions to mitigate health risks . A study by Shinki Pandey (2022) found that India's digital payment volume surged by an impressive 26.2 percent in 2020-21, following a remarkable 44.2 percent increase in the previous year . Furthermore, Hanedar et al. (2023) observe that the integration of UPI with other digital initiatives, such as the Account Aggregator framework, has greatly improved access to financial services for millions of people and businesses . Gochwal (2017) notes that UPI has simplified the payment process by eliminating the need for users to understand the complex payment information of all parties involved in a transaction . In addition to having an effect on financial inclusion, UPI may have had an impact on how monetary policy is communicated in India, pointed out M et al. (2024) .
In India, digital payments have been revolutionized by the Unified Payments Interface (UPI), which has drastically altered the nature of transactions. With over 9 billion transactions per month in 2023, there was an astounding 58% year-over-year increase . As of 2023, Chopra and Gupta (2023) report that UPI has contributed to economic savings of approximately INR 5.5 lakh crore ($67.07 billion) since its launch . By bringing millions of previously unbanked and underbanked people into the formal financial system, UPI's easy-to-use accessibility has promoted economic participation and literacy recorded World Bank. The efficiency of monetary policy transmission is enhanced by increasing the reach and velocity of money through digital payment platforms like UPI. Despite these developments, UPI's multilingual support and user-friendly interfaces have made it easier to use. Digital literacy is still a barrier, though, especially in rural areas, which emphasizes the value of educational initiatives in raising awareness and encouraging adoption . The growth of digital payments could face challenges due to digital illiteracy, inadequate internet connectivity in rural areas, and a lack of awareness among rural customers .
Research has shown that financial literacy enhances individuals' understanding of the various financial tools available to them, which allows them to make more informed and prudent financial decisions . Furthermore, financial stability partially mediates the link between financial literacy and financial inclusion. Although financial inclusion is directly impacted by financial literacy, financial stability is necessary for its full impact to be realized. With a coefficient of 0.0996, financial stability has a significant indirect impact on financial inclusion through literacy . Furthermore, the work of Paramasivan and Ganeshkumar (2013) and Vashisht and Wadhwa (2013) emphasizes that financial inclusion is a crucial element of economic development, ensuring that both individuals and businesses have access to, and can effectively utilize, a wide range of financial services . Moreover, Kumar and Shobana pointed that the rise in digital payment adoption offers central banks improved and up-to-date data on economic transactions, which facilitates the more efficient application of monetary policy and enhances economic management .
Research conducted by Rangrajan (2008) emphasizes that financial inclusion guarantees the underprivileged segments of society access to adequate credit and financial services at a reasonable cost . According to the studies by Ambarkhane et al. (2016) and Sarma (2008), the financial inclusion index serves as a key tool to assess the level of financial inclusion .
Muharsito and Muharam (2023) found that expanding financial inclusion plays a significant role in alleviating poverty by promoting savings, investments, and access to credit for low-income households and small businesses . Singh and Pushkar (2019) argue that financial inclusion is critical to a country’s economic progress, allowing individuals and small businesses to invest in their futures and contribute to overall prosperity .
Additionally, Reddy (2016) points out that while financial inclusion is essential for promoting inclusive growth, challenges such as inadequate financial literacy and ineffective credit delivery mechanisms continue to impede progress . Boston Consultancy Group (2016) studied the future of digital payments by 2020. According to the study, the digital payment system in India displays significant growth potential due to global changes that are also occurring within the Indian context. The main reasons behind this potential growth include the technological revolution that has made digitization easier, the entry of various non-banking institutions offering payment services, and the increasing consumer awareness and adaptation to one-touch payment systems .
Bhatia, Kumar, and Agarwal (2016) researched the contemporary study of microfinance, which has become a primary medium for extending financial services to unbanked populations through initiatives like the Jan Dhan Yojana in India . Financial inclusion has emerged as a major policy objective for the country’s development. Further research by Rastogi et al. (2021) found that the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana (PMJDY) and the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) play crucial roles in promoting financial inclusion, contributing to overall economic growth .
In addition to financial inclusion, the macroeconomic impact of UPI potentially extends to the realm of monetary policy transmission. Traditional monetary policy transmission mechanisms, such as the interest rate and credit channels, may be influenced by the widespread adoption of digital payments. The efficacy of monetary policy relies on the seamless transmission of policy signals from the central bank to the broader economy, influencing borrowing costs, investment decisions, and aggregate demand. The adoption of UPI and other digital payment methods can potentially expedite and amplify these monetary policy impulses throughout the economy .
Digital payments can reduce transaction costs, improve price transparency, and facilitate the flow of information, enhancing economic actors' sensitivity to changes in monetary policy . However, the increasing prevalence of digital payments could alter these dynamics, affecting the sensitivity of economic agents to policy interventions and the speed at which policy changes permeate through the financial system . UPI's success is also attributed to its open-protocol architecture, which promotes interoperability among diverse stakeholders and encourages continuous innovation .
Research shows that the exponential surge in digital payment adoption, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic, presents a unique opportunity to reassess and potentially recalibrate existing models of monetary policy transmission. This warrants further investigation into the nuanced effects on macroeconomic stability and financial system resilience . Nayan Ambali and Mahesh Jaisingh (2021) explore UPI’s effects on the Indian banking system and financial inclusion, finding that UPI has boosted digital payment adoption, supporting financial inclusion in India .
Richa Chaturvedi and Sangeeta Sharma (2021) highlight that UPI enhances financial inclusion in rural India by facilitating transactions for people in remote areas, thus promoting digital financial services . With the government's emphasis on a digital economy and the rising acceptance of UPI, India is set to emerge as a frontrunner in the digital payments arena. Looking ahead, UPI is anticipated to maintain its upward growth pattern with greater adoption, innovation, and expansion beyond borders .
Promoting financial inclusion should be fundamental to national and international policy initiatives to ensure that everyone is considered and to create opportunities for all . UPI has fundamentally changed the landscape of digital payments in India, promoting financial inclusion, enhancing economic activities, and paving the way for a future without cash . Narayanan et al. highlighted that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) serves as the main regulatory body, establishing rules for transaction thresholds, data security, and handling disputes. Nevertheless, the open framework of UPI presents challenges, particularly concerning anti-money laundering (AML) measures and consumer protection .
Arvind Chaudhari and Deepak Chaudhari (2019) found in their research that customers generally hold a favorable view of UPI services and emphasized the connection between the respondents' education levels and their use of UPI services .
Garg and Panchal (2017) noted a strong preference for cash transactions, with merchants avoiding record-keeping to evade taxes and buyers finding cash more convenient. Despite recent increases in cashless transactions, a meaningful shift relies on awareness, technological advancements, and government intervention .
Founded by the Ministry of Electronics & IT (MeitY) and subsequently moved to the Department of Financial Services (DFS), the DIGIDHAN Mission has been a vital component of promoting digital payments in MSMEs. Digital payment transactions have increased dramatically since their inception, rising from 2,071 crore in FY2017-18 to 13,462 crore in FY2022-2023. This increase highlights the increasing acceptance and integration of digital payments throughout the nation, which is supported by a variety of payment methods such as IMPS, debit/credit cards, and BHIM-UPI, among others .
In a study on the adoption of digital financial services by rural populations, Gaurav Agrawal (2019) identifies the obstacles to financial inclusion as being low financial literacy, high service costs, and regional disparities .
Mahajan and Agarwal (2023) identified that the number of digital transactions in the MSME sector has grown significantly over the years, with a 41.33 percent increase from 2021-22 to 2022-23, indicating that digital is the way forward. Although there was a slight dip during the Covid years, digital transactions have surged substantially since then .
3. Research Methods
3.1. Design of Research
In order to give a thorough analysis of UPI's contribution to the advancement of financial inclusion and the growth of rural inclusion MSMEs, this study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data.
Quantitative Research
1. Data Collection: Information about UPI transactions, including their volume and value, the number of active users, and their geographic distribution, was gathered using the NPCI dataset.
2. Data Analysis: To find trends and patterns in UPI usage, statistical methods, including linear regression analysis and time-series analysis, were used. Key measures of financial inclusion, including the rise in bank accounts, decline in cash transactions, and expansion of digital payments among MSMEs, were the focus of the examination.
3.2. Analysis of Data
Inferential Statistics: Using the sample data, inferential statistical techniques were applied to make inferences about the population. To ascertain the importance of the trends and connections that have been noticed, hypothesis testing was a part of this process.
4. Hypotheses
Based on the research questions and literature, the following hypotheses are formulated to evaluate the role of UPI in enhancing financial inclusion and MSME development in India:
H1: There is a statistically significant positive relationship between time and the average volume of UPI transactions per bank.
H0 (Null): Time has no effect on UPI transaction volume per bank.
H1 (Alternative): Time has a significant positive effect on UPI transaction volume per bank.
The null hypothesis is rejected since p-value (0.000) < 0.05.
H2: There is a statistically significant positive relationship between time and the average value of UPI transactions per bank.
H0: Time has no effect on UPI transaction value per bank.
H1: Time has a significant positive effect on UPI transaction value per bank.
The null hypothesis is rejected since p-value (0.000) < 0.05.
H3: UPI has contributed to increased digital transaction volume and value in India over time (from 2020- 2024).
H0: There is no significant growth in digital transaction volume/value over time.
H1: There is a significant increasing trend in digital transaction volume/value, indicating deepening financial inclusion.
The null hypothesis is rejected since both p-values (0.000) < 0.05.
H4: UPI and MSME growth are positively correlated.
H0: There is no statistically significant correlation.
H1: There is a significant increasing trend in digital transaction volume/value, indicating deepening financial inclusion.
5. Findings
(i) NPCI data
Digital payment transactions have seen a steady yet significant increase due to the government's streamlined efforts and the involvement of stakeholders .
In this study, to analyze the impact of UPI in advancing financial inclusion, linear regressions were conducted between the time variable (measured in months, starting from January 2020 to June 2025) and both the average volume and value of UPI transactions per bank in India, obtained via the NPCI website.
Table 1. Regression Table of time and transaction volume obtained through Stata.

Source

SS

df

MS

Number of obs

66

Model

23234.5515

1

23234.5515

F(1,64)

2071.19

Residual

717.94854

64

11.2179459

Prob > F

0.0000

Total

23952.5

65

368.5

R-squared

0.97

Adj R-Squared

0.9696

Root MSE

3.3493

month

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P > |t|

[95% Conf. Interval]

perbank

3.176047

0.0697873

45.51

0.000

3.036631

3.315464

_cons

-23.89451

1.326807

-18.01

0.000

-26.54512

-21.24391

For transaction volume per bank, the regression produced an R-squared value of 0.97 and a p-value of 0.00. This indicates an exceptionally strong and statistically significant linear relationship, with 97% of the variance in transaction volume explained by the passage of time.
Table 2. Regression Table of time and transaction value obtained through Stata.

Source

SS

df

MS

Number of obs

66

Model

20051.8771

1

20051.8771

F(1,64)

329

Residual

3900.62288

64

60.9472325

Prob > F

0.0000

Total

23952.5

65

368.5

R-squared

0.8372

Adj R-Squared

0.8346

Root MSE

7.8069

month

Coef.

Std. Err.

t

P > |t|

[95% Conf. Interval]

perbankvalue

0.0248299

0.0013689

18.14

0.000

0.0220952

0.0275646

_cons

-37.775

4.04529

-9.34

0.000

-45.85639

-29.6936

Source: NCPI
For transaction value per bank, the analysis yielded an R-squared value of 0.8372 and a p-value of 0.0000, demonstrating that 84% of the variance in average transaction value is similarly accounted for by time and that this association is highly statistically significant.
Figure 1. Value and Volume of UPI transactions from year 2020 to 2025 (June)
CAGR = 19.7568%
To examine whether UPI has contributed to financial inclusion, a trend analysis was conducted on UPI transaction volume and value from 2020 to 2025. The results show a consistent and statistically significant upward trend in both metrics over the period.
Linear regression analysis revealed that time strongly predicts UPI transaction volume (R² = 0.97, p < 0.001) and value (R² = 0.837, p < 0.001), demonstrating that the passage of time—representing the expansion of UPI adoption—accounts for a major portion of the increase in digital financial activity. The compound annual growth rate of UPI transaction value stood at approximately 19.75% over 2020-2024.
These results indicate deeper penetration and adoption of digital payments, thereby supporting the hypothesis that UPI has played a central role in advancing financial inclusion in India.
(ii) MSME

Years

Total

By Digital Means

Percentages

No. of transactions

Value in Rupees (In crore)

No. of transactions

Value in Rupees (In crore)

No. of Digital Transactions (in %)

Value of Digital Transactions (in %)

2020-21

3861529

18284.67

3376621

17946.58

90.19

92.02

2021-22

4135997

27292.98

3611362

26891.22

87.32

98.53

2022-23

5758260

20595.27

5104276

20115.15

88.64

97.67

2023-24

16620118

98,396.45

14486733

84046.984

87.16

85.42

Source: Annual Reports (from 2020-21 to 2023-24) of the Ministry of MSME
The MSME transaction data from 2020-21 to 2023-24 demonstrates a dramatic surge in both the volume and value of transactions, with a substantial majority being conducted digitally throughout the period. This trend reflects the critical role of UPI and digital payments in promoting financial inclusion within the MSME sector, facilitating access to formal finance, and supporting MSME growth. The evidence places digital platforms as essential tools in processing financial services and accelerating the expansion of micro, small, and medium enterprises in India.
The total number of MSME transactions increased substantially from approximately 3.86 million in 2020-21 to over 16.6 million in 2023-24, reflecting more than fourfold growth. The total value of transactions also grew, rising from ₹18,284.67 crore in 2020-21 to ₹98,396.45 crore in 2023-24, indicating more than a fivefold increase.
Throughout this period, the overwhelming majority of transactions were conducted through digital means, with the share of digital transactions by number remaining consistently high—from 90.19% in 2020-21 to 87.16% in 2023-24—and by value ranging from 92.02% to 85.42%.
A slight dip in the percentage share of digital transaction value in the latest year can be observed; however, the absolute digital transaction values have continued to rise significantly, underscoring growing trust and reliance on digital payment solutions.
6. Implications
The consistently high R-square values and highly significant p-values for both volume and value clearly demonstrate that the number and value of UPI transactions handled by banks grew steadily and strongly over the study period. These simultaneous increases imply that the UPI system is becoming more popular for both small and large financial transactions. This is because more people trust and rely on it.
These trends are strong signs that financial inclusion is growing in India: more people and businesses are using UPI to access, use, and get value from modern banking and digital payment solutions. The system's growth, as seen in the rising number of transactions and values per bank, supports the enabling of broader participation in the formal financial system and fosters economic development.
Transitioning from this aggregate perspective to the MSME sector, analysis of annual report data for 2020-21 to 2023-24 underscores the widespread and intensifying integration of digital transactions—primarily enabled by UPI—among micro, small, and medium enterprises. More than 85% of MSME transactions, by both volume and value, have consistently been digital throughout the period, even as total activity has expanded. This pattern affirms that the digital infrastructure exemplified by UPI is not only accelerating MSMEs’ access to financial services but is also empowering their operational flexibility, transparency, and growth potential.
7. Future Directions
For future directions, researchers can explore financial inclusion pre- and post-COVID, particularly in the rural or informal sector of the economy. Additionally, a sectoral analysis of how different schemes have impacted UPI or digital transactions in improving financial inclusion would be valuable. A sectoral analysis on the usage of UPI in different industries or verticals of India can also be conducted.
8. Conclusion
Since the introduction of digital transactions, particularly after demonetization, India has seen tremendous growth and movement towards a cashless economy. Among various methods of digital transactions, UPI is one of the biggest contributors. From the above study, a strong positive correlation is witnessed between UPI and financial inclusion in India. The CAGR of UPI transaction value recorded for the period 2020-2024 is around 19.75%. Furthermore, in the MSME sector, more than 85% of its transactions are via digital means, concluding it as a factor for advancement in this sector. The Indian government has taken various measures to further enhance the financial inclusion level through digital transactions by various initiatives like the DigiDhan Mission or Pradhan Mantri JandDhan Yojana. The government should continue to support the cashless economy and work towards its improvement.
Abbreviations

AML

Anti-money Laundering

BHIM

Bharat Interface for Money

CAGR

Compound Annual Growth Rate

DOI

Digital Object Identifier

GDP

Gross Domestic Product

IMPS

Immediate Payment Service

MSME

Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises

NPCI

National Payments Corporation of India

P2M

Person-to-Merchant

P2P

Peer-to-peer

PMJDY

Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana

RBI

Reserve Bank of India

UPI

Unified Payment Interface

Author Contributions
Kanak Sharma is the sole author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] NITI Aayog. (2021). Digital payments: Trends, issues, and opportunities. Government of India.
[2] Neema, K., & Neema, A. (2016). UPI (Unified Payment Interface) - A new technique of Digital Payment: An Explorative study.
[3] Shree, S., Pratap, B., Saroy, R. et al. Digital payments and consumer experience in India: a survey based empirical study. J BANK FINANC TECHNOL 5, 1-20 (2021).
[4] Nisha. (2021). Technology and Financial Inclusion: An Agenda for Holistic Growth. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 5(2(2), 35-39. Retrieved from
[5] Mahajan, P., & Agarwal, M. (2023). Digital Payments and MSMEs: Assessing Potential and impact. IRJEMS International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies, 549-553.
[6] JishaJoseph, M., & Varghese, T. (2014). Role of financial inclusion in the development of Indian Economy. Growth, 5(11).
[7] Karmakar, A. (2024). Unified Payments Interface (UPI): A Comprehensive Study of its Impact on India's Financial Landscape and Global Aspirations.
[8] RBI Bank Blog. UPI payment - features and benefits of UPI payments. 2023 May 15.
[9] Mehta, P., The Rise of Fintech in India: How Banks Manage Risk in the Digital Age (August 06, 2024). Available at SSRN:
[10] Fahad, N., & Shahid, M. (2022). Exploring the determinants of adoption of Unified Payment Interface (UPI) in India: A study based on diffusion of innovation theory. Digital Business, 2(2), 100040.
[11] Chaterji, A., Dr. Abhijeet, & Thomas, R. (2017). Unified Payment Interface (UPI): A Catalyst Tool Supporting Digitalization - Utility, Prospects & Issues. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 4(2). Available at SSRN:
[12] Duvendack, M., Sonne, L. & Garikipati, S. Gender Inclusivity of India’s Digital Financial Revolution for Attainment of SDGs: Macro Achievements and the Micro Experiences of Targeted Initiatives. Eur J Dev Res 35, 1369-1391 (2023).
[13] Vidani, J. (2024). A study on the rise and recent development in unified payments interface. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[14] Santiso C. Govtech against corruption: What are the integrity dividends of government digitalization? Data & Policy. 2022; 4: e39.
[15] Buteau, S., Rao, P. & Valenti, F. Emerging insights from digital solutions in financial inclusion. CSIT 9, 105-114 (2021).
[16] Nayak Kini A and Basri S. An empirical examination of customer advocacy influenced by engagement behaviour and predispositions of FinTech customers in India [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2022, 11: 27
[17] Windasari, N. Kusumawati, N. Larasati, R. P. Amelia Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2) (2022), Article 100170,
[18] Pandey, S. K. (2022). A Study on Digital Payments System & Consumer Perception: An Empirical Survey. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 10121-10131.
[19] Hanedar, E., Alonso, C., Uña, G., Prihardini, D., Bhojwani, T., & Zhabska, K. (2023). Stacking up the Benefits: Lessons from India’s Digital Journey. IMF Working Paper, 2023(078), 1.
[20] Gochwal, R. (2017). Unified payment interface—an advancement in payment systems. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 7(10), 1174-1191.
[21] Ansar, M., Asif, N., & Mahale, P. (2024). The impact of unified payment interface (UPI) on financial inclusion and economic development: A digital innovation perspective. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 5(4), 452-457.
[22] Inc42. The UPI Effect: How UPI Is Reshaping India’s Payment Industry. 2023 May 25.
[23] Chopra, C., & Gupta, P. (2023, June 26). India’s digital leap: the Unified Payment Interface’s unprecedented impact on the financial landscape. World Economic Forum.
[24] Srivastava, N. (2019). Digital Financial Services: Challenges and prospects for liberalized and globalized Indian economy. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[25] Fernandes, D., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2014). Financial literacy, financial education, and downstream financial behaviors. Management Science, 60(8), 1861-1883.
[26] Rastogi, S., Panse, C., Sharma, A., & Bhimavarapu, V. M. (2023). Unified Payment Interface (UPI): A Digital Innovation and Its Impact on Financial Inclusion and Economic Development. Journal of Digital Finance, 8(1), 45-62.
[27] C. Paramasivan, and V. Ganeshkumar. “Overview of Financial Inclusion in India”. International Journal of Management and Development Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, Mar. 2013, pp. 45-49,
[28] Vashisht, A., & Wadhwa, B. (2013). Financial inclusion - a tool to uplift people at ‘Bottom of Pyramid’ (BOP). SSRN Electronic Journal.
[29] Dr. J. SureshKumar | Dr. D. Shobana "Exploring Digital Payments, Financial Inclusion, and Monetary Policy in India" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Researchand Development (ijtsrd), ISSN:2456-6470, Volume-8 | Issue-1, February 2024, pp. 417-424, URL:
[30] Rangrajan. (2008). Report on the committee of financial inclusion. http://slbckarnataka.com/UserFiles/slbc/Full%20Report.pdf Retrieved 8/2/2022
[31] Ambarkhane, D., Shekhar Singh, A. S., & Venkataramani, B. (2016). Developing a comprehensive financial inclusion index. Management and Labour Studies, 41(3), 216-235.
[32] Sarma, M. (2008). Index of financial inclusion (Working Paper No. 215). New Delhi: Indian Council For Research On International Economic Relations.
[33] Muharsito, M., & Muharam, H. (2023). The effect of digital financial inclusion on bank efficiency. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (ICORAD), 2(1), 1-6.
[34] Singh, V., & Pushkar, B. (2019). A study on Financial inclusion: Need and challenges in India. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[35] Reddy, C. V. (2016). 12 Pillars’ Framework for Successful Financial Inclusion in India. Indian Journal of Finance, 10(12), 7-28.
[36] BCG (2016). Digital Payment 2020.
[37] Bhatia, A. Kumar, S. And Agarwal, A. (2016). A contemporary Study of Microfinance: A study for India’s Underprivileged. IOSR journal of Economics and Finance. pp. 23-31
[38] Rastogi, S., Panse, C., Sharma, A., & Bhimavarapu, V. M. (2021). Unified Payment Interface (UPI): A digital innovation and its impact on financial inclusion and economic development. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 9(3), 518-530.
[39] Sharma, A., Bhimavarapu, V. M., Kanoujiya, J., Rastogi, S., & Barge, P. B. (2022). Financial Inclusion - An Impetus to the Digitalization of Payment Services (UPI) in India. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(9).
[40] Ragini, B., & Prakash, J. V. (2024). Does unified Payment Interface (UPI) contribute to financial inclusion? The case of construction workers in Andhra Pradesh. In Springer proceedings in business and economics (pp. 257-272).
[41] Serrao, M. V., Sequeira, A. H., & Hans, B. (2012). Designing a methodology to investigate accessibility and impact of financial inclusion. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[42] Smith, B. (2025). A Novel Digital Payment Architecture: A Unified Payment Interface and its Systematic Transformation of Financial Infrastructure. Preprints.
[43] Kamal, M., Rahmani, S., & Alam, M. R. (2025). Beyond Traditional Banking: How Fintech is Reshaping Financial Access in India. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[44] Ambali, N., & Jaisingh, M. (2021). Impact of Unified Payment Interface on the Indian Banking System and Financial Inclusion.
[45] Chaturvedi, R., & Sharma, S. (2021). Role of Unified Payments Interface (UPI) in Financial Inclusion of Rural India: An Analysis.
[46] Baliyan, D., Singh, N., Faculty of Commerce, Hindu College, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India, & Faculty of Commerce, Govt. Degree College, Punwarka, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. (2023). UNIFIED PAYMENTS INTERFACE (UPI): A DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN INDIA. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 11(3), g414.
[47] VTK, S., Kulkarni, P., Justin, M. S. M., & Bhatta, N. (2023). Impact of UPI Utilisation on Financial Inclusion: Empirical Evidence from India. Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship, 17-17(1), 105-112.
[48] Odedra K, Rabadiya B, Vidani J. An analysis of identifying the business opportunity in agro and chemical sector - with special reference to African country Uganda. Compendium of Research Papers of National Conference 2018 on Leadership, Governance and Strategic Management: Key to Success. Pune: DY Patil University Press; 2018. p. 96-100.
[49] Vidani, J. (2024b). A study on the rise and recent development in unified payments interface. SSRN Electronic Journal.
[50] Chaudhari, A., & Chaudhari, D. (2019). To Study the Consumer Satisfaction on UPI (Unified Payments Interface) with Special Reference to Hyderabad and Suburbs. Research Journey‟ International Multidisciplinary E-Research Journal.
[51] Garg, P., & Panchal, M. (2017). Study on Introduction of Cashless Economy in India 2016: Benefits & Challenge’s. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 19(04), 116-120.
[52] PIB. (2023, 12 27). Ministry of Finance Year Ender 2023: Department of Financial Services. Retrieved from PIB:
[53] Gaurav Agrawal, P. J. (2019). Digital Financial Inclusion in India: A Review. Behavioral Finance and Decision Making Models, 9.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Sharma, K. (2025). Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 13(5), 336-344. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Sharma, K. Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2025, 13(5), 336-344. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Sharma K. Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2025;13(5):336-344. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19,
      author = {Kanak Sharma},
      title = {Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {13},
      number = {5},
      pages = {336-344},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20251305.19},
      abstract = {In 2016, the Indian government took a very firm stance on the black money market, which was followed by demonetization. Afterward, the government realized that the economy would benefit more from digital transactions and plastic money, considering Singapore as a reference. People were struggling to meet their basic needs; consequently, the government understood the importance of stabilizing the money supply, leading to the emergence of digital transactions and UPI. Objective: to investigate the dynamics of UPI transactions post-2020 and how UPI has been very critical in making financial inclusion a possibility in the Indian scenario. The paper also evaluates the role of UPI in MSMEs growth and development. Methods: Information about UPI transactions, including their volume and value, the number of active users, and their geographic distribution, was gathered using the NPCI dataset, on which we ran a linear regression model. For MSMEs, we saw a span of the last 4 years through the government’s annual report. Findings: Linear regression showed time predicts UPI transaction volume (R² = 0.97, p < 0.001) and value (R² = 0.837, p < 0.001), indicating that UPI adoption growth explains much of the rise in digital activity. The compound annual growth rate of UPI transaction value was about 19.75% from 2020 to 2024. The MSME transaction data from 2020-21 to 2023-24 shows a trend of an increase in the number and value of transactions, with the vast majority of them being carried out online during this time.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Evaluating UPI's Role in Advancing Financial Inclusion and MSMEs' Development in India
    
    AU  - Kanak Sharma
    Y1  - 2025/10/18
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 336
    EP  - 344
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20251305.19
    AB  - In 2016, the Indian government took a very firm stance on the black money market, which was followed by demonetization. Afterward, the government realized that the economy would benefit more from digital transactions and plastic money, considering Singapore as a reference. People were struggling to meet their basic needs; consequently, the government understood the importance of stabilizing the money supply, leading to the emergence of digital transactions and UPI. Objective: to investigate the dynamics of UPI transactions post-2020 and how UPI has been very critical in making financial inclusion a possibility in the Indian scenario. The paper also evaluates the role of UPI in MSMEs growth and development. Methods: Information about UPI transactions, including their volume and value, the number of active users, and their geographic distribution, was gathered using the NPCI dataset, on which we ran a linear regression model. For MSMEs, we saw a span of the last 4 years through the government’s annual report. Findings: Linear regression showed time predicts UPI transaction volume (R² = 0.97, p < 0.001) and value (R² = 0.837, p < 0.001), indicating that UPI adoption growth explains much of the rise in digital activity. The compound annual growth rate of UPI transaction value was about 19.75% from 2020 to 2024. The MSME transaction data from 2020-21 to 2023-24 shows a trend of an increase in the number and value of transactions, with the vast majority of them being carried out online during this time.
    
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India